Abstract

BackgroundChildren separated from their caregivers in humanitarian emergencies are vulnerable to multiple risks. However, no field-tested methods exist to capture ongoing changes in the frequency and nature of separation in these contexts over the course of a protracted crisis.MethodsRecognizing this gap, a mobile phone-based surveillance system was established in a drought-affected district in northern Ethiopia to assess the feasibility of using community focal points to monitor cases of unaccompanied and separated children. A total of 29 focal points were recruited through village elections from 10 villages in the district. Feasibility was assessed directly by measuring the number and quality of messages sent by the focal points each week. The team also evaluated the implementation process and any challenges that arose through observations and key informant interviews with focal points at the conclusion of the project measuring frequency of employing various information gathering techniques, challenges faced, and perceptions of community expectations. Likert scales were used to measure overall satisfaction with the experience of being a focal point, self-assessed difficulty of being a focal point, perceived likelihood of cases captured, and motivation.ResultsOver a six-month period, the focal points reported 48 cases of separation. The majority of separated children (64.6%) were 10 years of age or older. Work was a major driver of separation, especially for boys. Age, sex, role in community, and density of community had no statistically significant impact on focal point performance in terms of frequency, accuracy, or consistency of messages. The focal points themselves reported high levels of motivation, but suggested several areas for improvement in the surveillance system.ConclusionsWithout the surveillance system, most of these children would have otherwise been unrecognized. From a technical standpoint the system was successful and resilient in the face of unexpected external challenges. However, focal point participation and accuracy was variable over time and across groups and diminished towards the later months of the study, suggesting that the community-based approach may require additional supports to ensure that the surveillance system is able to accurately capture trends over time.

Highlights

  • Children separated from their caregivers in humanitarian emergencies are vulnerable to multiple risks

  • In an effort to mitigate these adverse outcomes, there is widespread consensus within the humanitarian field that family tracing and reunification of unaccompanied and separated children should be among the first activities that practitioners implement after an emergency

  • The surveillance system was developed by methodologists from Columbia University in partnership with Save the Children and implemented with the International Organization for Migration (IOM), as well as in close collaboration with the Government of Ethiopia and the national Child Protection Sub-Cluster

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Children separated from their caregivers in humanitarian emergencies are vulnerable to multiple risks. Separation is one of the greatest protection risks faced by children in humanitarian emergencies. In other situations, separated children do not have any adult caregivers – this latter subgroup of separated children are referred to as “unaccompanied.” In comparison with children who are not separated, unaccompanied and separated children (UASC) experience adverse physical and psychological outcomes, including increased food insecurity, violence, exploitation, and stress [3,4,5]. In an effort to mitigate these adverse outcomes, there is widespread consensus within the humanitarian field that family tracing and reunification of unaccompanied and separated children should be among the first activities that practitioners implement after an emergency. Despite decades of applied programmatic experience, several gaps in understanding unaccompanied and separated children remain, especially regarding information about the frequency and characteristics of separation in a given emergency setting

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.