Abstract
Since the emergence of influenza A/H1N1 pandemic virus in March–April 2009, very stringent interventions including Fengxiao were implemented to prevent importation of infected cases and decelerate the disease spread in mainland China. The extent to which these measures have been effective remains elusive. We sought to investigate the effectiveness of Fengxiao that may inform policy decisions on improving community-based interventions for management of on-going outbreaks in China, in particular during the Spring Festival in mid-February 2010 when nationwide traveling will be substantially increased. We obtained data on initial laboratory-confirmed cases of H1N1 in the province of Shaanxi and used Markov-chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC) simulations to estimate the reproduction number. Given the estimates for the exposed and infectious periods of the novel H1N1 virus, we estimated a mean reproduction number of 1.68 (95% CI 1.45–1.92) and other A/H1N1 epidemiological parameters. Our results based on a spatially stratified population dynamical model show that the early implementation of Fengxiao can delay the epidemic peak significantly and prevent the disease spread to the general population but may also, if not implemented appropriately, cause more severe outbreak within universities/colleges, while late implementation of Fengxiao can achieve nothing more than no implementation. Strengthening local control strategies (quarantine and hygiene precaution) is much more effective in mitigating outbreaks and inhibiting the successive waves than implementing Fengxiao. Either strong mobility or high transport-related transmission rate during the Spring Festival holiday will not reverse the ongoing outbreak, but both will result in a large new wave. The findings suggest that Fengxiao and travel precautions should not be relaxed unless strict measures of quarantine, isolation, and hygiene precaution practices are put in place. Integration and prompt implementation of these interventions can significantly reduce the overall attack rate of pandemic outbreaks.
Highlights
The 2009 influenza A/H1N1 pandemic outbreaks have exhibited some unique patterns in mainland China [1,2]
Based on recently available estimates of the epidemiological characteristics such as the incubation and latent periods, and the duration of treated symptomatic infection, and based on our model MF ignoring asymptomatic infection we estimated the mean control reproductive number (Rc) as 1.682 (95% CI 1.446–1.918, Figure S2 (A)), the mean quarantine rate qe as 0.125 and qp as 0.387 for the period from September 3rd to September 21st 2009
Using initial data on the laboratory-confirmed cases of pandemic H1N1 influenza in the province of Shaanxi, we obtained estimates of the reproduction number, nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) parameter values and the number of individuals who were exposed to the virus
Summary
The 2009 influenza A/H1N1 pandemic outbreaks have exhibited some unique patterns in mainland China [1,2]. A tightly monitored measure of movement restriction [3,4], was put in place to proscribe college and university students, faculty, and staff members to leave their campuses, and to disallow on-campus visits while maintaining essential services and normal scientific activities (File S1) These NPIs may have contributed to reducing disease incidence, their effectiveness from the standpoint of public health policy remains undetermined. This fall wave declined quickly due to very strict interventions in early September, but the declining trend was reversed following the October National Day holiday during which population mobility increased and Fengxiao was suspended. The bimodality of an epidemic may in general be due to a variety of factors such as varying rates of mobility, exogenous seasonal process and/or endogenous changes in the population, it is natural we chose to focus here on the impact of mobility and NPIs on the pandemic infection
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have