Abstract

BackgroundMost newborn deaths occur among those of low birthweight (LBWt), due to prematurity &/or impaired fetal growth. Simple practices can substantially mitigate this risk. In low-income country settings where many births occur at home, strategies are needed that empower mothers to determine if their babies are at higher risk and, if so, to take measures to reduce risk. Earlier studies suggest that foot-length may be a good proxy for birthweight. An earlier Nepal study found a 6.9 cm cut-off performed relatively well, differentiating normal from low birthweight.MethodsCommunity-based, cluster-randomized controlled trial. Objective: to determine whether family-administered screening, associated with targeted messages improves care practices known to mitigate LBWt-associated risks. Participants: women participating in a parent trial in rural Nepal, recruited late in pregnancy. Women were given a 6.9 cm card to assess whether the baby’s foot is small; if so, to call a number on the card for advice. Follow-up visits were made over the 2 weeks following the birth, assessing for 2 behavioral outcomes: reported skin-to-skin thermal care, and care-seeking outside the home; assessed restricting to low birthweight (using 2 cutoffs: 2500 g and 2000 g). Randomization: 17 clusters intervention, 17 control.The study also documented performance along the presumed causal chain from intervention through behavioral impact.Results2022 intervention, 2432 control. Intervention arm: 519 had birthweight < 2500 g (vs. 663 among controls), of which 503 were available for analysis (vs. 649 among controls). No significant difference found on care-seeking; for those < 2500 g RR 1.13 (95%CI: 0.97–1.131). A higher proportion of those in the intervention arm reported skin-to-skin thermal care than among controls; for those < 2500 g RR 2.50 (95%CI: 2.01–3.1). However, process measures suggest this apparent effect cannot be attributed to the intervention; the card performed poorly as a proxy for LBWt, misclassifying 84.5% of those < 2000 as normal weight.ConclusionsAlthough the trial found an apparent effect on one of the behavioral outcomes, this cannot be attributed to the intervention; most likely it was a result of pure chance. Other approaches are needed for identifying small, at-risk babies in such settings, and targeting them for appropriate care messaging.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02802332, registered 6/16/2016.

Highlights

  • Most newborn deaths occur among those of low birthweight (LBWt), due to prematurity &/or impaired fetal growth

  • Most newborn deaths are among such babies of low birth-weight, either those growth-restricted in utero or born preterm; globally, “low-birthweight babies constitute only about 14% of children born, they account for 60–80% of neonatal deaths” [3]

  • The objective of our study was to determine if an intervention entailing provision to women late in pregnancy of a simple tool allowing them to classify their newborns as small increases uptake of key care practices, notably: skin-to-skin thermal care and seeking treatment for possible danger signs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Most newborn deaths occur among those of low birthweight (LBWt), due to prematurity &/or impaired fetal growth. In low-income country settings where many births occur at home, strategies are needed that empower mothers to determine if their babies are at higher risk and, if so, to take measures to reduce risk. An earlier Nepal study found a 6.9 cm cut-off performed relatively well, differentiating normal from low birthweight. Most newborn deaths are among such babies of low birth-weight, either those growth-restricted in utero or born preterm; globally, “low-birthweight babies constitute only about 14% of children born, they account for 60–80% of neonatal deaths” [3]. Babies at high risk due to low birthweight are often not recognized as such and, may not receive needed care. From the most recent Nepal Demographic and Health Survey [7], in rural areas fewer than half of births were in health facilities (44%) and among those in the bottom wealth quintile, only one third

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.