Abstract

Plant community response to climate change ranges from synchronous tracking to strong mismatch. Explaining this variation in climate change response is critical for accurate global change modeling. Here we quantify how closely assemblages track changes in climate (match/mismatch) and how broadly climate niches are spread within assemblages (narrow/broad ecological tolerance, or "filtering") using data for the past 21,000 years for 531 eastern North American fossil pollen assemblages. Although climate matching has been strong over the last 21 millennia, mismatch increased in 30% of assemblages during the rapid climate shifts between 14.5 and 10 ka. Assemblage matching rebounded toward the present day in 10%-20% of assemblages. Climate-assemblage mismatch was greater in tree-dominated and high-latitude assemblages, consistent with persisting populations, slower dispersal rates, and glacial retreat. In contrast, climate matching was greater for assemblages comprising taxa with higher median seed mass. More than half of the assemblages were climatically filtered at any given time, with peak filtering occurring at 8.5 ka for nearly 80% of assemblages. Thus, vegetation assemblages have highly variable rates of climate mismatch and filtering over millennial scales. These climate responses can be partially predicted by species' traits and life histories. These findings help constrain predictions for plant community response to contemporary climate change.

Highlights

  • Climate is often considered the main driver of assemblage structure across large spatial and temporal scales (Webb 1986; Pearson and Dawson 2003)

  • Plant community response to climate change ranges from synchronous tracking to strong mismatch

  • Climate matching has been strong over the last 21 millennia, mismatch increased in 30% of assemblages during the rapid climate shifts between 14.5 and 10 ka

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Climate is often considered the main driver of assemblage structure across large spatial and temporal scales (Webb 1986; Pearson and Dawson 2003). Mismatches between assemblage composition and climate may arise from habitat differences, dispersal lags, and species traits or from species interactions that structure communities through time and across space, acting on their own and/or interacting with climate (Ackerly 2003; Ricklefs 2004; Blois et al 2013a; Dalsgaard et al 2013). Such mismatch is of applied importance because it links to assemblage persistence/survival (Dullinger et al 2015) and ecological forecasting (Svenning and Sandel 2013; Barnosky et al 2017). There is a need to (1) better understand the role of climate change and other processes in driving assemblage dynamics and to (2) understand how this variation can be predicted over time and space

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.