Abstract
The article focuses on the differences between constative and performative utterances found in Initial Public Offering texts. Various types of communicative infelicities found in performative statements within prospectus’ texts are investigated. Sufficient notice has been taken in the most evident reasons for infelicities discovered in performative statements in Initial Public Offering texts, which are analysed in the article. This article demonstrates the peculiarities of the factors that reduce or nullify the responsibility of the issuer and researches the chapters of Initial Public Offering where these factors are obvious and where the usage of these factors can be logically explained.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
