Abstract

Engagement in interprofessional collaborative practice is critical for communication disorders professionals to provide quality clinical services. Given limited research on implementation of interprofessional education (IPE) within communication disorders pre-professional training programs and research highlighting potential barriers to implementation of IPE, this investigation assessed communication sciences and disorders (CSD) faculty attitudes toward IPE. One hundred fifty-eight CSD faculty from accredited CSD graduate programs completed the Interprofessional Attitudes Scale (Norris, Carpenter, Eaton, Guo, Lassche, Pett, & Blumenthal, 2016). Collectively, the faculty supported CSD students learning from and with students from different disciplines and endorsed IPE as beneficial. Faculty with master’s degrees were more likely to believe that IPE would increase student’s effectiveness as clinical care team members, whereas more faculty with research doctorates indicated that biases toward other professionals could get in the way of providing intervention. Compared to faculty in colleges other than health sciences, faculty in colleges of health sciences reported experiencing more bias toward and from professionals of other disciplines. Despite group differences, a majority of CSD faculty overwhelmingly favored IPE for students suggesting that the attitudes of CSD faculty toward IPE may not be a barrier to implementation of IPE within pre-professional training programs.

Highlights

  • Best practice in healthcare includes interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP), as noted by the World Health Organization (WHO; 2010), which necessitates interprofessional education (IPE) during pre-professional preparation

  • The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA), the Council of Academic Programs in Communication Sciences and Disorders (CAPCSD) and the Council on Academic Accreditation in Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology (CAA) have taken a strong stance on IPCP to ensure communication sciences and disorders (CSD) professionals are prepared and willing to provide service aligned with a non-hierarchical interprofessional service delivery model

  • With the mandate for all CSD programs to implement IPE, it is critical that we develop resources to help all programs successfully implement IPE

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Best practice in healthcare includes interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP), as noted by the World Health Organization (WHO; 2010), which necessitates interprofessional education (IPE) during pre-professional preparation. IPE occurs when two or more professionals learn about, from, and with each other to enable effective collaboration and improve health outcomes (WHO, 2010). The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA), the Council of Academic Programs in Communication Sciences and Disorders (CAPCSD) and the Council on Academic Accreditation in Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology (CAA) have taken a strong stance on IPCP to ensure communication sciences and disorders (CSD) professionals are prepared and willing to provide service aligned with a non-hierarchical interprofessional service delivery model. The 2017 CAA accreditation standards for speech-language pathology and audiology programs introduced professional competencies related to IPE/IPCP requiring programs to provide opportunities for students to demonstrate the listed competencies

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call