Abstract

Nowadays, with large-scale offshore wind power farms (WPFs) becoming a reality, more efforts are needed to maintain a reliable communication network for WPF monitoring. Deployment topologies, redundancy, and network availability are the main items to enhance the communication reliability between wind turbines (WTs) and control centers. Traditional communication networks for monitoring and control (i.e., supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems) using switched gigabit Ethernet will not be sufficient for the huge amount of data passing through the network. In this paper, the optical power budget, optical path loss, reliability, and network cost of the proposed Ethernet Passive Optical Network (EPON)-based communication network for small-size offshore WPFs have been evaluated for five different network architectures. The proposed network model consists of an optical network unit device (ONU) deployed on the WT side for collecting data from different internal networks. All ONUs from different WTs are connected to a central optical line terminal (OLT), placed in the control center. There are no active electronic elements used between the ONUs and the OLT, which reduces the costs and complexity of maintenance and deployment. As fiber access networks without any protection are characterized by poor reliability, three different protection schemes have been configured, explained, and discussed. Considering the cost of network components, the total implementation expense of different architectures with, or without, protection have been calculated and compared. The proposed network model can significantly contribute to the communication network architecture for next generation WPFs.

Highlights

  • In the near future, our dependence on conventional fossil fuels as the main energy source will need to be replaced by the use of renewable sources of energy

  • We propose different communication network architectures based on the electrical topology for small-scale wind power farms (WPFs)

  • Propose communication network architectures for WPF monitoring based on Ethernet Passive Optical Network (EPON) technology; Configure the network model of small-scale WPFs, based on electric power topologies; Analyze the optical power budget and path loss to ensure that the received signal power at the wind turbines side is sufficient to maintain acceptable performance; Make a reliability analysis of the communication network, consisting of optical line terminal (OLT), feeder fiber (FF), passive optical splitter (POS), distributed fiber (DF), and optical network unit device (ONU); Compare the connection availability between OLT and WT-ONUs with different protection schemes; and Compare the network costs for 20 different architectures with, and without, protection schemes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Our dependence on conventional fossil fuels as the main energy source will need to be replaced by the use of renewable sources of energy. We propose different communication network architectures based on the electrical topology for small-scale WPFs. The reliability block diagram approach is used to calculate the availability of the proposed EPON model between optical line terminal (OLT) and WT-ONUs, with different protection schemes. Propose communication network architectures for WPF monitoring based on EPON technology; Configure the network model of small-scale WPFs, based on electric power topologies; Analyze the optical power budget and path loss to ensure that the received signal power at the wind turbines side is sufficient to maintain acceptable performance; Make a reliability analysis of the communication network, consisting of OLT, feeder fiber (FF), passive optical splitter (POS), distributed fiber (DF), and ONU; Compare the connection availability between OLT and WT-ONUs with different protection schemes; and Compare the network costs for 20 different architectures with, and without, protection schemes.

Related Work
Proposed
EPON‐based
Architecture
Architecture one POS
It similar toonshore architecture with the only difference
Optical Power Budget
Total optical path
Reliability
EPON‐based Protection Schemes
10. Reliability
12. Reliability for Full
Network
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call