Abstract
This article aims to review the concept of action and answer how communication ethics faces the ambivalence of digital technology. Using a critical-normative research method on the works of Aristotle and Hannah Arendt, this study finds that in the face of the ambivalence of digital technology, communication ethics needs to put digital actions back on the consciousness of the perpetrator. In addition, communication ethics must overcome banal clicks and deal with the robotic manipulators of digital systems. There are two ways to use it: first, a complicated way in the form of resistance to digital manipulators, and the second is a soft way, which is to reposition the three virtues, namely courage, honesty, and elegance, to build digital altruism in digital communication ethics.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
