Abstract
The article deals with the analysis of the social order conditions, which are natural for a human and which are explained through personification of cultural meanings and locality that has ethnic context. Generalization of knowledge about the socio-natural relationships in a person's life has been performed using the principle of consistency and socio-cognitive approach. The multifaceted nature of dynamics of the mentality, on which the trust to authorities is based, and which draws upon the subconsciously normalized ethnic consciousness, is emphasized. It is shown that the main means of total control in the context of the natural social order is the indirect metadiscursive communicative impact through the introduction of semantic settings hidden behind the outer side of symbolic and speech practices. In conclusion, the stability of the non-violent mechanism for maintaining the social order in spite of ongoing political and cultural transformations is emphasized. The destruction of the natural social order is made possible as a result of discursive provocations shifting the basic semantic and value-related references that are inherent in the subconscious. DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n3s3p265
Highlights
In everyday life, social order is associated with the administrative and legal framework of the government, which directs the activities of institutions that support a specific regulation of public and private life
The basis of the social order is formed by the generalized codes of communication –the code of power and the code of truth, which define the semantic canvas perceived by each member of the community (Luhmann, 1979)
We believe that the natural basis of non-violent social order is best described by the ethical ethnic stereotype, in the formation of which a key role belongs to perception of place and time by the individual and the community
Summary
Social order is associated with the administrative and legal framework of the government, which directs the activities of institutions that support a specific regulation of public and private life. Along with the progress of the information age with its interactive dynamics of networks, the idea of the social order is problematized. New ways to form the social order at the level of mobile networks occur, which are based on informal norms and values (Castells, 2000-2004). The fact of orderliness of the systems of perception and action in human community is described with the societal process concept, which consists in orientation and sustainable reproduction of social and inter-individual interactions within a meaningful interval and cultural space. The social order is based on the reproduction of culture through the system of knowledge and educational institutions in the interests of ruling elites (Bourdieu, 1991). Uncertainty of trust structures as the most common and the least significant basis of social cohesion (Hosking, 2015) forces us to analyze the hidden grounds of the communicative practice in communities, specific beliefs, life goals, which are formed spontaneously in line with the emotional belonging to a reference group (Taylor, 1985; MacIntyre, 1981)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
