Abstract

Ecologists are increasingly encouraged by funding agencies and professional societies to communicate their research with the public. However, most receive relatively little training in how to do this effectively. Furthermore, evaluation of whether such an investment by ecologists actually achieves conservation objectives is rare. We created an education program, involving print, television, radio, and internet media, to increase awareness about earthworm invasions and to discourage anglers from dumping earthworm bait. Using pre- and post-surveys, we evaluated our program’s success in reaching its target audience and in changing knowledge and behavior. Few participants (4.1%) recalled seeing the program material and knowledge of the fact that earthworms are non-native in Alberta remained low (15.8% before, 15.1% after). Further, after being told about the negative effects of earthworms in forests, 46.7% of the anglers surveyed stated they would not change their bait disposal behavior in the future, with many commenting that they did not believe earthworms could be harmful. These results highlight the importance of evaluating education programs, rather than assuming they are successful. Given many participants’ doubts that earthworms have negative effects, both regulations and education may be needed to reduce earthworm introductions.

Highlights

  • Anthropogenic activities are causing unprecedented changes to the environment worldwide, leading to calls for ecologists to devote a greater amount of their time to communicating research findings with the public and policy makers (Lubchenco 1998, Holdren 2008)

  • Using pre- and post- surveys, we evaluated whether anglers had encountered program materials, their level of knowledge about earthworm invasions, and their attitudes towards changing their method of disposing of earthworm bait

  • Before implementation of our education program, 15.8% (SE 0.77) of anglers were aware that earthworms were not historically found in Alberta, compared to 15.1% (SE 1.8) of anglers in 2011/12

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Anthropogenic activities are causing unprecedented changes to the environment worldwide, leading to calls for ecologists to devote a greater amount of their time to communicating research findings with the public and policy makers (Lubchenco 1998, Holdren 2008). Even advocacy, is viewed by some as a social responsibility of scientists (Lovejoy 1989, Noss 2007, Nelson and Vucetich 2009). This sense of duty may be a important source of motivation for senior researchers, while junior scientists appear to be driven by enjoyment and personal satisfaction as well (Martin-Sempere et al 2008). Scientists often do not view public communication as a core aspect of their work and may believe it has neutral or negative impacts on promotion because of the time it takes away from research (Gascoigne and Metcalfe 1997, Martin-Sempere et al 2008)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call