Abstract

BackgroundGaps in microbiology communication can lead to suboptimal antibiotic prescribing. In May 2016, our laboratory modified reporting of respiratory cultures growing commensal flora only to specify “no methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus/MRSA or Pseudomonas aeruginosa” (PA). The purpose of this study was to compare MRSA and PA antibiotic therapy utilization before and after the change.MethodsIRB approved, quasi-experiment at four hospitals with an antimicrobial stewardship program. Dates: August 1, 2015–January 31, 2016 and August 1, 2016–January 31, 2017. Included: ≥18 years, commensal flora only respiratory culture, empiric MRSA and PA antibiotic for treatment of lower respiratory infection. Excluded: non-respiratory infection. Primary outcome: MRSA or PA therapy de-escalated. Secondary outcomes: time to culture result, MRSA and PA antibiotic days of therapy, length of stay. Safety outcomes: acute kidney injury (AKI), C. difficile (CDI), subsequent multi-drug-resistant organism (MDRO), in-hospital all-cause mortality.ResultsTwo hundred and ten patients included, 105 per group. Median age 64 and 61 years, male sex 52% and 56% in pre- and post-group, respectively. Empiric antibiotics, pre vs. post: vancomycin 94% vs. 95%; cefepime 66% vs. 36%; piperacillin–tazobactam 10% vs. 46%. MRSA or PA antibiotics de-escalated: 39% pre and 73% post (P < 0.001). See Table 1 for variables associated with antibiotic de-escalation. Days of therapy: 7 vs. 5 days (P < 0.001). AKI 31% vs. 14% (P = 0.003). Eight subsequent MDRO in pre and one in post (P = 0.035). No differences: time to culture result, length of stay, mortality, CDI.ConclusionImproved microbiology communication to assist prescriber interpretation of commensal respiratory flora was associated with a reduction in the proportion of patients that received antibiotics targeting MRSA and PA.Table 1.Antibiotic de-escalationNo antibiotic de-escalationUnadjusted OR [CI]Adjusted OR [CI]No MRSA, no PA comment77 (65%)28 (30%)5.0 [2.5–10.0]5.7 [2.9–11.0]Charlson Comorbidity Index < 342 (36%)60 (65%)3.4 [1.9–6.0]3.0 [1.6–5.7]APACHE II ≤1545 (39%)56 (61%)2.5 [1.4–4.4]2.7 [1.4–5.3]Long-term care14 (12%)9 (10%)0.8 [0.3–2.0]0.4 [0.1–1.0]≥2 SIRS criteria52 (44%)53 (58%)1.7 [1.0–3.0]–Previous antibiotics57 (48%)40 (44%)0.8 [0.5–1.4]–Hospitalization >48 hours51 (43%)39 (42%)1.0 [0.6–1.7]–Disclosures S. Davis, Merck: Received grant through college that I’m faculty for, Grant recipient; Allergan: Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee; Allergan: Consultant and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee; Medicines Company: Consultant and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee; Zavante: Consultant and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.