Abstract
The aim of this article was to examine the costs and effectiveness of standardized blood and fecal investigations in patients fulfilling the Rome criteria for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We conducted a real-life cohort study in patients fulfilling the Rome III criteria for IBS without red flag signs or symptoms, in a center of excellence for IBS patients from 1 January 2015 till 1 January 2019. Standardized blood and fecal investigations [hemoglobin (Hb), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), coeliac serology, and fecal calprotectin (FCP)] were performed during the first consultation. Patients were followed for at least 1 year. Primary outcome was the probability of another diagnosis than IBS with subsequent overall costs. A total of 218 patients were included. In approximately 200 patients blood and fecal investigations were performed and 47 patients underwent a colonoscopy. Two-hundred ten patients were diagnosed with IBS, 5 with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), 1 with nonspecific acute ileitis, 1 with hyperthyroidism, and 1 with coeliac disease. The number needed to diagnose all included laboratory tests was 34, and for the individual test: TSH 197, coeliac serology 199, and FCP 50. The total costs were approximately €4900 to diagnose one patient with another diagnosis than IBS. In our real-life cohort of adult patients under the age of 50 years fulfilling the Rome criteria for IBS without red flag symptoms, standardized blood, and fecal investigations have a very low diagnostic yield accompanied by high additional costs. Colonoscopy is not indicated in patients with Rome III positive IBS and normal FCP.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.