Abstract

If the principle of national sovereignty arises from the element of unilateral development in the Third World, with developing countries accepting the capitalist world economy and competing against one another within it, the principle of common heritage arises from the element of solidarity and multilateralism that exists in Third World politics. This chapter on common heritage is divided into three sections. In the first section, we outline our conception of common heritage. This conception is taken primarily from that expounded in the 1960s by the Maltese Ambassador to the UN, Arvid Pardo, with regard to the mineral wealth of the seabed. We elaborate and strengthen this conception by co-opting the ‘difference principle’ of John Rawls. In the second section, we show that, contrary to widespread belief, the common heritage ethic still retains an influence in the politics of genetic resource control. In the third section, we demonstrate that the common heritage ethic is compatible with both the community IPR principle and the national sovereignty principle.KeywordsGenetic ResourceChoice TheoryDifference PrinciplePlant Genetic ResourceInternational ArenaThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.