Abstract

Bycatch in pelagic longline fisheries threatens the viability of some seabird populations and reduces fishing efficiency. The mass of a branchline fishing weight and its distance from the hook significantly explain seabird catch risk during setting and hauling. We surveyed Hawaii tuna longline fishers to obtain their perspectives on the practicality, safety and economic viability of alternative designs which place weights adjacent to hooks instead of conventional designs with weighted swivels attached 0.6 m from the hook. We conducted experimental fishing to explore the commercial viability of a combination weighted swivel attached to the eye of the hook. We used a Bayesian random effects meta-analytic regression modeling approach to estimate pooled expected species-specific log relative risk of capture on conventional, as opposed to experimental, branchlines. There were significant decreases in catch rates on experimental branchlines of 54% (95% highest posterior density interval [HDI]: 34.3 to 73.8) for retained species and 28% (95% HDI: -7.5 to 93.3) for discarded species. For about 10% of experimental weighted hooks, the point of the hook tangled on the swivel, likely contributing to lower catch rates and making it more difficult for crew to coil branchlines. We identify possible factors explaining why the experimental gear reduced catch rates. The study demonstrates the benefits of stakeholder scoping to determine bycatch mitigation options with the highest promise for practicality, economic viability and safety, as well as benefits of conducting a pilot study to assess commercial viability to determine if a full experiment to assess bycatch mitigation efficacy is warranted.

Highlights

  • Capture in global pelagic longline fisheries threatens the viability of some seabird populations (Véran et al 2007, Anderson et al 2011, Phillips et al 2016), while bait loss to scavenging seabirds and handling incidentally caught seabirds reduces fishing efficiency

  • The closer a weight of a given mass is to the hook, the less time it takes for the weight to affect the hook’s sink rate near the surface and the less time baited hooks are available to surface-foraging seabirds (Robertson et al 2013, Jiménez et al 2019)

  • During hauling, the closer a weight is to the hook, the more likely the weight will reduce the availability of baited hooks to surface-foraging seabirds (Gilman et al 2014a)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Capture in global pelagic longline fisheries threatens the viability of some seabird populations (Véran et al 2007, Anderson et al 2011, Phillips et al 2016), while bait loss to scavenging seabirds and handling incidentally caught seabirds reduces fishing efficiency (Brothers et al 1999, Gilman et al 2005, Løk-Publisher: Inter-Research · www.int-res.comEndang Species Res 43: 223–233, 2020 rates (Gilman et al 2016, Gilman & Ishizaki 2019). The mass of a branchline fishing weight and the weight’s distance from the hook significantly affect seabird catch rates during setting (Gilman et al 2008, Melvin et al 2013, 2014, Robertson et al 2013, Santos et al 2019) and hauling (Gilman et al 2014a) in pelagic longline fisheries. These 2 variables affect the sink rate of baited hooks and concomitant availability to seabirds during gear setting. During hauling, the closer a weight is to the hook, the more likely the weight will reduce the availability of baited hooks to surface-foraging seabirds (Gilman et al 2014a)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.