Abstract
The desire for commercial farming is underlined by economic linkages such as employment and income but oftentimes, commercial farming seldom generates expected benefits to the local population. This paper extends debates of skewed implications of commercial farming using a case of sugarcane farming in Eastern Uganda to investigate whether commercial farming can be a solution to youth socio-economic and livelihood vulnerabilities. Data was collected using structured questionnaires, thematic interview guides and focus group discussions. Our findings show a suboptimal impact of sugarcane farming on youth livelihoods. The authors argue that while sugarcane farming offers positive socio-economic linkages, it is inadequate to solve youth vulnerabilities of unemployment and low incomes because of meagre earnings from poor sugarcane jobs. We contend that commercial farming as a youth-based intervention should be matched with mechanisms that address structural traps such as difficult working conditions and poor remuneration embedded in large-scale farming.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.