Abstract
The commentator writes in defense of ethical relativism, maintaining that M.C. McFarland (ibid., vol.23, no.3, p.77-81, Mar. 1990) has confused it with ethical nihilism. He argues that ethical relativism is completely consistent with a professional society's formation of ethical standards. McFarland replies that he and the commentator agree on the definition of ethical relativism but differ on its implications. He points out some deeper issues that he believes relativism does not address. >
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
