Abstract

The original paper [see ibid., vol, 41, p 1468-71, 1993] is claimed to contain nothing new either in substance or in application. It would appear that one of the reasons for the publication is that the integrals derived therein are not found in common references. Furthermore, the proof given in the paper is in the nature of a verification and hence hinges upon knowing the correct answers beforehand. It is not difficult to establish direct proofs. The original authors give their reply to these comments. >

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.