Abstract
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 1and Kuhn’s afterthoughts (1970a, 1974) have been subjected to so much penetrating criticism that any further examination might be supposed redundant.2 There are, however, two epistemological theses in his work which have not, in my opinion, received adequate analysis. They are not essentially dependent upon considerations of Gestalt switches, theory-ladenness of observation, incommensurability, or the ambiguity of the word ‘paradigm’, which have received much critical attention.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
