Abstract
Professionals in many domains of activity must juggle sometimes competing objectives and sometimes competing pathways in their ethical, legal, humane, and just pursuit of effective service. I am confident that the vast majority of judges will be able to promote risk– need–responsivity (RNR) approaches to rehabilitation in the majority of their cases and do so without trumping proportionality or promoting the victimization of the disadvantaged. The phrase crimeprevention jurisprudence was introduced in order to promote crime prevention as a worthy primary goal, without its being rendered incidental or secondary to other aspects of justice and personal wellbeing. It is very pleasing to see all contributors so supportive of additional research on the process and outcomes of risk assessment.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
