Abstract
My comments concern the sever error in the crystallographic part of the commented paper. It was found that the studied crystal is of the sillenite type and the correct formula should be Bi25FeO39:Cd,Ti instead of some kind of solid solution based on BiFeO3. Moreover, the type of unit cell is not correct. Due to the double doping the new type of unit cell, previously unknown, was proposed for such crystals. The actual chemical composition of the studied crystals is not known.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
