Abstract
For the original article see ibid., vol. 10, no. 3, p. 390-98 (1991). In the aforementioned paper by S. Sastry and A. Majumdar the testing effectiveness of random pattern techniques is studied and the authors claim to give complete analytical solutions to the problem of estimating such an effectiveness. The commenters point out that the analysis is based on an oversimplified circuit model, and, therefore, the conclusions are invalid. They comment on the analysis and explain its weakness, especially with respect to the built-in self-test (BIST) technique referred to as circular self-test path (CSTP). >
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
