Abstract
This is a critical comment on a review of the research methodology in tax compliance costs by Turner, Smith and Gurd in the Revenue Law Journal” volume 8, 1998. It argues that there are inaccurate assertions in their review. Many of their recommendations, while correct, are well known in the literature and difficult to implement in practice. In evaluating previous Australian studies, Turner, Smith and Gurd did not take account of resource constraints facing early researchers. They failed also to highlight in a systematic fashion the conceptual advancement and improvements in data collection in the more recent studies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
