Abstract
In this note, we address an inconsistency in our recent article (Hakimi-Moghaddam and Ferrante, 2021). In particular, we provide an example showing that Lemma III.1 of that article is not correct. We show how the statement of this lemma can be modified in order to resolve this inconsistency. We also describe how this modification impact the other results of the article. Notwithstanding the fact that Lemma III.1 plays a central role in the proof of the main result of (Hakimi-Moghaddam and Ferrante, 2021), we show that such a result is indeed correct as it may be derived by using the modified (and correct) version of the lemma. An illustrative example is provided to support the results.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
