Abstract
For the original article see ibid., vol.MTT-35, no.4, p.383-95 (1987). In commenting on the above named work by D.T. Borup et al. it is asserted that certain wrong assumptions about the FFT (fast Fourier transform) conjugate gradient method lead to meaningless statements in the original work. In a reply from two of the three original authors is it made clear that (1) several conclusions attributed to the original work do not appear in the work; and (2) an algorithm claimed in the comment to be the solution of an operator equation, as opposed to a matrix equation, is actually equivalent to a matrix moment solution.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
