Comments on “Arc magmatism and subduction history beneath the Zagros Mountains, Iran: A new report of adakites and geodynamic consequences” by J. Omrani, P. Agard, H. Whitechurch, M. Bennoit, G. Prouteau, L. Jolivet

Abstract

Based on the imprecise geochemical data for 62 samples from Qom, Anar and Baft regions in central Iranian magmatic arc Omrani et al. (Omrani, J., Agard, P., Witechurch, H., Benoit, M., Prouteau, G., Jolivet, L., 2008. Arc magmatism and subduction history beneath the Zagsros Mountains, Iran: A new report of adakites and geodynamic consequences. Lithos 106, 380–398.), suggested that all studied magmatic rocks display the geochemical affinity of subduction-related calc–alkalic rock suites. Here, we demonstrate that the incorrect altered and variable geochemical data (e.g., Al2O3, Sr, Y, Ni, Cr, SiO2, Na2O, La/Yb and Th/Ce), show that most of the samples actually display calc–alkaline, shoshonitic and calc–alkalic–adakitic affinities. Furthermore, as a result of alteration, rock samples of similar age (e.g., Qom) indicate both adakitic and non-adakitic compositional signatures, which is misleading. On the basis of more than 400 previously published geochemical analyses, we suggest that, after eliminating the false geochemical signatures, the calc–alkaline and adakitic affinities of the central Iranian magmatic arc are due to flat subduction and might be related to a second phase of Miocene- Pliocene porphyry copper mineralization, which is a considerable exploration target and thus merits further investigation.