Abstract
Steele and Miller presented an alternative method of calculation for the WKB solution of the standard two-dimensional cochlear model. They claim that their results improve upon the original WKB calculations of Steele and Taber [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 65, 1001–1006 (1979)], notably near the resonance location. This claim is shown to be incorrect. A recently developed calculational procedure which does give better results than those of Steele and Taber is briefly outlined.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
