Abstract
In the above article (Pan et al., 2023), it is shown that the solution given for the –90 <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$^\circ$</tex-math> </inline-formula> directional coupler with adjustable phase difference slope is inadequate for equal power division purposes. The proposed solution results in a significant error between the two outputs of the coupler. Exact, correct solutions are derived for the coupler, which proves that the proposed solution in Pan et al. (2023) corresponds to the coupler for an unequal power division case rather than the equal power division.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
