Abstract
Recently, a public auditing protocol for shared data called Panda (IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, doi: 10.1109/TSC.2013.2295611) was proposed to ensure the correctness of the outsourced data. A distinctive feature of Panda is the support of data sharing and user revocation. Unfortunately, in this letter, we show that Panda is insecure in the sense that a cloud server can hide data loss without being detected. Specifically, we show that even some stored file blocks have been lost, the server is able to generate a valid proof by replacing a pair of lost data block and its signature with another block and signature pair. We also provide a solution to the problem while preserving all the desirable features of the original protocol.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
