Abstract
In the paper by L.U. Gokdere and M.A. Simaan (see ibid., vol. 44, p.688-95, 1997), a comparison is made between a passivity based controller and an input-output linearization controller. We point out that this comparison is not valid as the same trajectory was not used for both controllers. The original authors reply to this comment pointing out that there is experimental evidence demonstrating the benefits of the passivity-based controller developed for induction motors. These include closer tracking of the same mechanical trajectory, and less sensitivity to magnetic saturation, when compared with the input-output linearization controller.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
