Abstract

For the original article see ibid., vol.39, no.12, p.2160-9 (1981). The commenters summarize the conclusions of the above-titled paper by Z. Chen et al. in five statements. They show that the first four are partly incorrect and the fifth is misleading. In their reply, Chen et al. argue that these five statements are the commenter's conclusions, not theirs. They discuss these statements, agreeing with some of the commenters' points and disagreeing with others. >

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.