Abstract
The glossed judgment concerns, inter alia, the rules for providing factual and legal information contained in Art. 9 of the Code of Administrative Procedure. The Supreme Administrative Court primarily referred to the material scope of this principle. The authors of this gloss share the view expressed by the Supreme Administrative Court, according to which, under Art. 9 of the Code of Administrative Procedure, expect the authority to inform the party, in the context of its potential procedural rights, about the advantages and disadvantages of individual institutions of administrative proceedings. At the same time, the authors express their appreciation for the position formulated in the literature, according to which the principle resulting from Art. 9 of the Code of Administrative Procedure cannot be equated with advice from an authority to a party to the proceedings. The conducted analysis includes the latest jurisprudence of administrative courts
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
