Abstract
Catalan and colleagues aggregated findings related to detection, prognosis, and intervention in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis (CHR-P) children and adolescents through October 7, 2019 (Catalan et al., 2020). While a sufficient number of studies were available to meta-analytically summarize evidence on detection and prognosis, the authors highlight the need for more studies on interventions, including cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis, in CHR-P youth. Further research on the biological and neural correlates of CHR-P in children and adolescents is also needed. Though results from the few existing biomarker studies in CHR-P youth were included in the systematic review, disparate study methodologies and outcomes prohibited biomarker study meta-analysis.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
