Abstract
This commentary concerns two recently developed metaheuristic algorithms, namely the Sooty Tern Optimization Algorithm, and the Tunicate Swarm Algorithm. Both of these algorithms claim computational superiority over other methods based on experimental results on a certain benchmark set. The aim of this note is to aware researchers that this claim is not valid: the proposed algorithms use a zero-bias operator and many of the studied benchmark functions on which they were found superior have optimal solutions located in the zero vector. Moreover, the codes for the methods provided by the authors are not achieving the results reported in the respective publications.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
