Commentary on Jones et al.: We must consider emergency medical services data an opportunity for a view into a community.

Abstract

Jones et al. demonstrate that through hard work and thoughtful review, even disparate data can assist the advancement of public health and public policy across jurisdictions. An emergency medical services industry-led focus on documentation standards and data integration can make this easier and more effective for our patients. Jones et al. have taken on the challenging task of identifying the characteristics of opioid-related incidents (ORI) from emergency medical services (EMS) calls to assess the impact of opioids in Massachusetts. They responded to a legislative mandate to review EMS records by creating a free text search and a five-tier severity cascade where opioid use can be identified, even without overdoses [1]. These researchers demonstrate the need to review all available data despite the fact that Massachusetts [2], like much of the United States, utilizes multiple EMS documentation platforms, written in disparate documentation styles, then aggregated through the National EMS Information System (NEMSIS) [3]. Authors have focused previously upon the use of naloxone to identify a non-fatal overdose [4-6], but many ORI do not receive naloxone [7]. Jones et al. used a free text search for terms in the narrative to point to specific types of ORI. This search function was elegantly designed to go beyond the discrete variables of NEMSIS and search for ORI by intoxicant name and concerning symptoms. Jones et al. have previously demonstrated gender disparity with EMS naloxone administration, indicating why it is vital to use narrative data to identify ORI [8]. The strength of this search and the ORI severity cascade is further demonstrated, as 29% of the opioid intoxications and 36% of all ORI did not receive naloxone. The OTHER ORI allows a broad range of conditions that can factor into the impact of opioid use disorder and serve as a further marker for opportunity for intervention and change. EMS records are the first chapter of the story of nearly every critical patient encounter and assist in the care of vulnerable patients. However, when hospital systems implement an electronic health record they frequently save money by not integrating local EMS data. When embedded in the health-care continuum, EMS data can help to advance public health and public policy. Jones et al.’s multi-tiered approach to ORI is an important step towards realizing this goal. Michael Winter Dailey: Writing—original draft (lead); writing—review and editing (equal). Emma Furlano: Writing—original draft (supporting); writing—review and editing (equal).