Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide a commentary on Bates et al.'s discussion of the importance of subtle support and some of the pitfalls and potential of supporting people on a one to one basis in their community.Design/methodology/approachThis paper reflects on Bates et al.'s account in the context of a wider consideration of the meaning of support and key research findings, especially for people with more severe intellectual disabilities.FindingsSubtle support is important, but it is necessary to be clearer about what it entails.Originality/valueThe paper welcomes the debate about subtle support and calls for the inclusion of a focus on the quality of support provided for people with more severe intellectual impairments. Further, the lessons should be used from empirical research regarding the distribution of assistance and the effectiveness of active support particularly the component known as positive interaction.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call