Abstract
This commentary is an attempt to provide a complementary vision to analyze the study carried out by Giorgi, Padiglione and Pontecorvo. Based on their data, the authors describe three main categories of home appropriation: predominant, proscriptions and incomplete appropriations, each one with clear definitions and descriptions. However, the authors acknowledge that the nature of the methodology and the duration of the study did not permit a thorough study of how these self-representations are constructed. For this reason, here we provide an alternative analysis of the study using the concepts of semiotic mediation and dialogical self, which could be used to propose future research in the field of meaning construction in the home.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
