Abstract
Despite the poor evidence base behind many complementary therapies and the lack of proper licensing and governance in many areas, complementary medicine is popular with many. This issue of the BJGP features a discussion of some of the ethical deficits that are allowed to continue in day-to-day practice in the burgeoning complementary medicine field.1 Of course, it is trying for conventional medical practitioners to witness the apparently free hand afforded complementary therapists while their own practice is increasingly affected by demands that it must be guided by evidence of clinical- and cost-effectiveness, for continuing …
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
