Abstract

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Letters to the EditorFull AccessComment on “What Happened to Lithium?: Antidepressant Augmentation in Clinical Settings”TAKESHI TERAO MD, Ph. D.,TAKESHI TERAO MD, Ph. D.Search for more papers by this author,Published Online:1 Dec 2006https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.2006.163.12.2196bAboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail To the Editor: I am very surprised at the article by Marcia Valenstein, M.D., M.S., et al. (1) showing that only 1,106 (0.5%) of 244,855 patients with depression received lithium augmentation. On the other hand, the most popular augmenting drugs were a second antidepressant and a second-generation antipsychotic, received by 26,739 (11%) and 17,797 (7%) patients, respectively. Moreover, 9,053 (4%) patients received augmentation with anticonvulsants, while 11,054 (5%) received other augmenting drugs, such as thyroid hormone, stimulants, and buspirone. Taking strong evidence for lithium as an augmenting drug of refractory depression (2) into consideration, I cannot accept the findings by Dr. Valenstein et al. (1) as they are. At least two possibilities are yet to be investigated. The first possibility is that most patients receiving lithium had been apparently and/or automatically diagnosed as suffering from bipolar disorder, which was excluded from their subjects. Because, according to Food and Drug Administration, lithium is indicated in the treatment of manic episodes of manic-depressive illness (i.e., bipolar disorder) and in maintenance therapy of bipolar disorder, but not in augmentation therapy for depression. Therefore, many patients actually receiving lithium augmentation for refractory depression might have been excluded from their analysis. The second possibility is that a significant proportion of patients had discontinued lithium augmentation within 60 days because lithium augmentation can bring about rapid responses in some patients (3) . They also might have been excluded from the subjects. Oita, Japan

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.