Abstract

Lightning in winter (December, January, February, DJF) is rare compared to lightning in summer (June, July, August, JJA) in central Europe. The conventional explanation attributes the scarcity of winter lightning to seasonally low values of variables that create favorable conditions in summer. Here we systematically examine whether different meteorological processes are at play in winter. We use cluster analysis and principal component analysis and find physically meaningful groups in ERA5 atmospheric reanalysis data and lightning data for northern Germany. Two sets of conditions emerged: Wind-field-dominated and mass-field (temperature) dominated lightning conditions. Wind-field type lightning is characterized by increased wind speeds, high cloud shear, large dissipation of kinetic energy in the boundary layer, and moderate temperatures. Clouds are close to the ground and a relatively large fraction of the clouds is warmer than −10 °C. Mass-field type lightning is characterized by increased convective available potential energy (CAPE), the presence of convective inhibition (CIN), high temperatures, and accompanying large amounts of water vapor. Large amounts of cloud-physics variables related to charge separation such as ice particles and solid hydrometeors further differentiate both mass-field and wind-field lightning. Winter lightning is wind-field driven whereas in summer lightning is mostly mass-field driven with a small fraction of cases being wind-field driven. Consequently, typical weather situations for wind-field lightning in the study area in northern Germany are strong westerlies with embedded cyclones. For mass-field lightning, the area is typically on the anticyclonic side of a southwesterly jet.

Highlights

  • IntroductionMid-latitude thunderstorms are much rarer in winter than in summer. For example, lightning in summer produces 97 % of the total lightning activity in Europe (Poelman et al, 2016; Wapler, 2013)

  • The conventional explanation for the paucity of winter lightning is the paucity of favorable conditions for strong convection, which lead to thunderstorms in summer

  • We first present the results of the cluster analysis and the principal component analysis (PCA), which reveals 130 that most lightning in winter is explained by wind-field variables while most lightning in summer is explained by mass-field variables (Sect. 4.1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mid-latitude thunderstorms are much rarer in winter than in summer. For example, lightning in summer produces 97 % of the total lightning activity in Europe (Poelman et al, 2016; Wapler, 2013). The transported electrical charges are often 20 higher in winter and the damage potential is higher. The conventional explanation for the paucity of winter lightning is the paucity of favorable conditions for strong convection, which lead to thunderstorms in summer. Larger transported charges and more frequent initiation of lightning from tall (human-made) structures in winter elevate the damage potential. This has become a major concern as a consequence of the proliferation of the installation of tall wind turbines in the push towards renewable energy sources. Matsui et al (2020) show that 30 wind turbine lightning accidents in Japan in winter are 47 times more frequent and more severe than in summer

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.