Abstract
In a recent Eos article, Sofia [2004] argues for the influence on irradiance variation of global changes in the Sun's structure associated with its magnetic dynamo. These changes would act in addition to the relatively well understood modulation by dark sunspots and bright faculae at the surface. His assessment of the present observational evidence for such a global change agrees with our earlier conclusion that it is not widely convincing at the present time [Foukal, 2003]. But Sofia's article also claims (1) that the numerical results obtained by him and his collaborators at Yale disagree with and correct earlier work, and (2) that a hydrostatic approximation is not adequate for variations on the 11‐year solar cycle timescale. These surprising claims are based on the results of recently published hydrostatic models [e.g., Sofia and Li, 2004] using the same mixing length approximation for convective heat transport used in earlier work [Spruit, 1982, 1991; Gilliland, 1988].
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
