Abstract
In a recent paper [Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 117201 (2003)], it is argued that an itinerant antiferromagnet in an external magnetic field undergoes a spin-flip transition, in marked contrast with the behavior of a localized antiferromagnet: for a weak magnetic field, the magnetization is parallel to the field, and flips to the perpendicular configuration at a critical value of the field. In this Comment we show that these conclusions are incorrect. The canted state (not considered in the Letter) is the antiferromagnetic ground state of the system up to a critical value of the field where the normal state is restored, in qualitative agreement with the behavior of the magnetization in a localized antiferromagnet.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
