Abstract
Recently S. Galam and A. Mauger [Phys. Rev. E 56, 322 (1997)] proposed an approximant which relates the bond and the site percolation threshold for a particular lattice. Their formula is based on a fit to exact and simulation results obtained earlier for different periodic and aperiodic lattices. However, the numerical result for an aperiodic dodecagonal lattice does not agree well with the proposed formula. I present here new and more precise data for this and other aperiodic lattices. The previously published value for the dodecagonal lattice is confirmed. The reason for the deviation from the Galam and Mauger approximant is discussed.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
