Abstract
Skolianos et al. [Phys. Rev. A 89, 033818 (2014)] recently published a derivation of the thermal phase noise in a Fabry-P\'erot resonator. We point out that the thermally driven noise properties of an optical resonator can only be understood from the derivation of the signal-to-noise ratio and not from consideration of phase noise alone. The differences in expressions for the thermal phase noise given in the published literature (e.g., Ref. [5] of Skolianos et al. 2014) and those derived by Skolianos et al. [Phys. Rev. A 89, 033818 (2014)] arise only from differences in definition of optical phase and do not result in incorrect calculation of thermodynamically driven cavity length fluctuations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.