Abstract

A recent paper by Luken and Sinano\ifmmode \check{g}\else \v{g}\fi{}lu (Phys. Rev. A 13 1293, 1976) has criticized some of our work and contains material on excited states and oscillator strengths. We suggest that satisfaction of upper boundedness via the Hylleraas-Undheim-MacDonald theorem is neither a sufficient nor a necessary condition for obtaining reasonably accurate oscillator strengths. Our method for truncated Hamiltonian matrices which chooses the root which minimizes the energy as well as the correlation overlap $〈\frac{X}{X}〉$ in fact yielded upper bounds and did not suffer a "variational collapse." We point out that for excited valence states embedded in Rydberg or continuum series, the $f$ values are very sensitive to (a) choice of basis sets and (b) Relative position of diagonal matrix elements. The Ni $^{4}S^{o}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}2s2{p}^{4} ^{4}P$, Bi $^{2}P^{o}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}2s2{p}^{2} ^{2}S$, Ci $2{p}^{2} ^{3}P\ensuremath{\rightarrow}2s2{p}^{3} ^{3}P^{o}$ transitions serve as examples.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.