Abstract
It is pointed out that the unexpected result that the magnitude of the reversible work of cavity creation in ethylene glycol proves to be larger than that in water [I. Sedov and T. Magsumov, J. Chem. Phys. 153, 134501 (2020)] could be due to that (a) the density of the used computational model of this liquid is "significantly" larger than the experimental one and (b) the procedure adopted to perform the comparison among the different liquids is not "strictly" correct. It is also indicated that several lines of evidence suggest that the magnitude of the reversible work of cavity creation in water can be larger than that in ethylene glycol.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
