Abstract
We argue that the recently reported compound 4-bromo-4′-nitrostilbene (1) is not a novel organic NLO crystal as claimed by Dinakaran, Kalainathan, Opt. Mater. 35 (2013) 898–903, but instead a well known compound whose characterization data and SHG efficiency are well documented in literature. The title paper is completely erroneous. Two more similar erroneous papers by the same authors are also commented.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
