Abstract
Nithianandan and associates 1 Nithianandan H. Jegatheeswaran V. Dalal V. et al. Refractive laser-assisted cataract surgery vs. conventional manual surgery: comparing efficacy and safety in 3144 eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019; 206: 32-39 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (6) Google Scholar have compared the visual, refractive, and safety outcomes in refractive laser-assisted cataract surgery (ReLACS) and manual cataract surgery (MCS) and compared results for difficult eyes. Their results support the potential role for ReLACS in more difficult cases. Refractive Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery versus Conventional Manual Surgery: Comparing Efficacy and Safety in 3144 EyesAmerican Journal of OphthalmologyVol. 206PreviewTo report on outcomes of the efficacy and safety in 1 of the largest series of eyes undergoing either conventional manual cataract surgery (MCS) or refractive femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (ReLACS). Full-Text PDF Refractive Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery versus Conventional Manual Surgery: Comparing Efficacy and Safety in 3144 Eyes: Reply to CorrespondenceAmerican Journal of OphthalmologyVol. 208PreviewWe thank Agrawal and associates1 for submitting their important observations regarding our recently published study titled, “Refractive laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional manual surgery: Comparing efficacy and safety in 3144 eyes.” This large study was unique in its ability to investigate whether there was a difference in the performance and safety of conventional manual cataract surgery (MCS) when compared with refractive femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (ReLACS) in more difficult cases. Full-Text PDF
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
