Abstract
Key Points The crustal model proposed by Pedrera et al. (2017) is not supported by the available deep seismic data set The gravity model is built upon inaccurately retrieved residual gravity anomalies and uses inappropriate density values The sequential restoration shows geometric‐structural inconsistencies, mechanical difficulties, and problematic isostatic and kinematic implications
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have