Abstract

Bubbles formed by breaking waves in the open ocean influence many surface processes but are poorly understood. We report here on detailed bubble size distributions measured during the High Wind Speed Gas Exchange Study (HiWinGS) in the North Atlantic, during four separate storms with hourly averaged wind speeds from 10–27 m s−1. The measurements focus on the deeper plumes formed by advection downwards (at 2 m depth and below), rather than the initial surface distributions. Our results suggest that bubbles reaching a depth of 2 m have already evolved to form a heterogeneous but statistically stable population in the top 1–2 metres of the ocean. These shallow bubble populations are carried downwards by coherent near-surface circulations; bubble evolution at greater depths is consistent with control by local gas saturation, surfactant coatings and pressure. We find that at 2 m the maximum bubble radius observed has a very weak wind speed dependence and is too small to be explained by simple buoyancy arguments. For void fractions greater than 10−6, bubble size distributions at 2 m can be fitted by a two-slope power law (with slopes of −0.3 for bubbles of radius < 80 μm and −4.4 for larger sizes). If normalised by void fraction, these distributions collapse to a very narrow range, implying that the bubble population is relatively stable and the void fraction is determined by bubbles spreading out in space rather than changing their size over time. In regions with these relatively high void fractions we see no evidence for slow bubble dissolution. When void fractions are below 10−6, the peak volume of the bubble size distribution is more variable, and can change systematically across a plume at lower wind speeds, tracking the void fraction. Relatively large bubbles (80 μm in radius) are observed to persist for several hours in some cases, following periods of very high wind. Our results suggest that local gas supersaturation around the bubble plume may have a strong influence on bubble lifetime, but significantly, the deep plumes themselves cannot be responsible for this supersaturation. We propose that the supersaturation is predominately controlled by the dissolution of bubbles in the top metre of the ocean, and that this bulk water is then drawn downwards, surrounding the deep bubble plume and influencing its lifetime. In this scenario, oxygen uptake is associated with deep bubble plumes, but is not driven directly by them. We suggest that as bubbles move to depths greater than 2 m, sudden collapse may be more significant as a bubble destruction mechanism than slow dissolution, especially in regions of high void fraction. Finally, we present a proposal for the processes and timescales which form and control these deeper bubble plumes.

Highlights

  • The heterogeneous bubble plumes produced in the open ocean during high wind conditions have been studied for many years 40 (Medwin and Breitz, 1989; Farmer et al, 1993; Graham et al, 2004; Vagle et al, 2010)

  • Deike et al (Deike et al, 2016) used a combination of laboratory experiments and theoretical assumptions to generate a model for the bubble size distribution under the active crest of a breaking wave, which applies to bubbles above the Hinze scale and covers the majority of the void fraction during active breaking

  • Our 610 data confirms the suggestion by Zedel & Farmer (1991) that bubble plumes of several metres depth are formed when coherent circulations advect bubbly surface water downward and that these deep plumes are not directly connected to breaking waves

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The heterogeneous bubble plumes produced in the open ocean during high wind conditions have been studied for many years 40 (Medwin and Breitz, 1989; Farmer et al, 1993; Graham et al, 2004; Vagle et al, 2010). Wave-breaking is often accompanied by the formation of deep bubble plumes (> 50 ~2 m) which are observed using sonar These are known to vary with environmental conditions (Vagle et al, 2010), and have been clearly associated with Langmuir circulation patterns (Zedel and Farmer, 1991). Deane et al (Deane et al, 2013) constructed a partial model for the larger bubbles forming a persistent surface bubble layer (radii > 100 μm), based on the idea that bubbles will be trapped in the surface layer if their buoyant rise speed does not exceed the turbulent flow speed expected at a given wind speed This model was designed for the evaluation of the acoustics of the 110 bubbly water near the surface and did not contain an explicit bubble source function, but matched observations of acoustical attenuation at sea. At the end of this paper we use the results from both papers to present a suggested outline of the bubble processes leading to deep bubble plumes

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.