Abstract

Recently, we reported the simulation of a stable open state of the glycine receptor. Central to the stability of the simulations was the behavior of the highly conserved leucine residues at the 9' gate, which were found to rotate into adjacent pockets, thus providing a structural rationale for decades of biochemical observations. In contrast, a previously reported model from Cerdan etal. (2018) resembled a more collapsed state. However, in support of their model, they draw attention to the agreement between calculated and experimental conductance measurements and argue that our model tends to overestimate ion flow. Here, we argue that there are many pitfalls with this approach and that the apparent agreement most likely reflects a fortuitous cancellation of errors. The computed values are highly sensitive to very small changes in model parameters. It is also likely that polarization effects will be very significant, and these have not yet been considered.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.